Mr. Gerald Dumbhead !
Just happened to come across an article by Mr. Gerald Warner in the Telegraph - feel free to look at this link -
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/geraldwarner/100002433/barack-obama-holds-a-fire-sale-of-americas-nuclear-defences-in-moscow/
Couldn't help but put in a few of my thoughts about this dumbass after I got through it -
The article is another of those I have 20 guns to your 15, so I have bigger balls arguments, needless to say, this Mr. Gerald Warner who is an author, broadcaster, columnist and polemical commentator (what the heck does that mean anyway?) and who writes about 'society in general' has no clue in hell about what 'one' nuclear weapon can do and why it is no different from what '2146 nuclear warheads' on your roster can do in a nuclear standoff.
I can understand arguments about the feasibility of a new healthcare plan or a fucked up government prop up of financial institutions plans, but arguing about the intelligence behind reducing global armaments does nothing but propagate a fucked up understanding of the damage potential of these weapons. Mr. Gerald needs to understand that a nuclear warhead is not his grandma's burnt-out rockhard apple pie that disintegrates when its thrown at his overgrown head - a nuclear warhead of today's potency would burn the skin off his ass if it exploded in NY while his constipated ass sat in a potty in Boston !
I won't be surprised if this was the guy who had this sticker on a car that I noticed yesterday - "I am going to keep my guns, freedom and money - you keep the change".
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/geraldwarner/100002433/barack-obama-holds-a-fire-sale-of-americas-nuclear-defences-in-moscow/
Couldn't help but put in a few of my thoughts about this dumbass after I got through it -
The article is another of those I have 20 guns to your 15, so I have bigger balls arguments, needless to say, this Mr. Gerald Warner who is an author, broadcaster, columnist and polemical commentator (what the heck does that mean anyway?) and who writes about 'society in general' has no clue in hell about what 'one' nuclear weapon can do and why it is no different from what '2146 nuclear warheads' on your roster can do in a nuclear standoff.
I can understand arguments about the feasibility of a new healthcare plan or a fucked up government prop up of financial institutions plans, but arguing about the intelligence behind reducing global armaments does nothing but propagate a fucked up understanding of the damage potential of these weapons. Mr. Gerald needs to understand that a nuclear warhead is not his grandma's burnt-out rockhard apple pie that disintegrates when its thrown at his overgrown head - a nuclear warhead of today's potency would burn the skin off his ass if it exploded in NY while his constipated ass sat in a potty in Boston !
I won't be surprised if this was the guy who had this sticker on a car that I noticed yesterday - "I am going to keep my guns, freedom and money - you keep the change".
Comments